Lincoln
It IS sentimental and over-respectful; too many adoring gazes from black servants, soldiers quoting the Gettysburg Address, heart-rending “freedom chords” at strategic points, telling you how to feel, as Adam Mars-Jones puts it. Daniel Day-Lewis is brilliant and does “disappear into the role” (Kirsty Wark, I think) and it’s fun to play spot the actor in the supporting cast; there’s Shane out of “The Shield”, Layne out of MadMen playing Ulysses Grant – sorry, spoiler there – and that elderly, white-locked bloke who has been in everything since forever, playing Preston. Tommy Lee Jones is great and Sally Field as irritating as ever.
Back in 1981, I visited Mormon HQ in Salt Lake City. They had a series of life – size dioramas portraying the history of the Mormon religion. At times, “Lincoln” reminded me of this, especially towards the end. However, one shouldn’t be too critical – it’s hard to see how Spielberg could avoid paying his respects, given Lincoln’s stature and the issues involved. I suppose if someone over here did Churchill in WW2 it would be as respectful – or maybe not? One last, obvious comparison: The West Wing.
Schwitters at Tate Britain
I can’t think of an exhibition I have seen in the last few years which had a higher ratio of successes to duds than this one. The fabric and paper collages, though many were tiny, were great, for the most part. Age helped, maybe, in that most were slightly browned and faded, softening the colours to pastel; fragments of words and numbers, for some reason, work well – maybe because they provide a sort of ready-made motif. Easy to overdo, though, and he rarely overdoes. I didn’t like the ones where he used cutouts of people; I thought that he strayed into surrealist, Max Ernst territory when he did this; one or two were almost like Stezaker.
Generally, Schwitters is best when he sticks to straight lines, unless he’s sticking a round object straight on; the ones with curves or painted circles I thought were less successful. That goes, in fact, for the paintings in general. There are some unremarkable portraits, a couple of dodgy seascapes, some quite bad feathery abstract efforts and an especially bad “Madonna and Child”, like a wave with two rings on the crests. often, the colours are too garish.
I loved the sound poetry – half recited, half sung, with the “words” on the wall. Still, for me, the best of the large collages is the one that was in the “Migrations” exhibition a while ago – “Picture with Spatial Growths – Picture with Two Small Dogs”. That great, convex sweep from top left to just right of centre at the bottom, on the area of black – from a distance, it looks like a painting. Highly recommended; I’m definitely going again, soon.
Turner
Before the Schwitters, I took a walk through the Turner galleries; there are two new seascapes that caught my eye immediately – “Rough Seas” and “Rough Seas with Wreckage”. Both very “abstract”, especially the first; superficially, from a distance, with your eyes half-closed, it looks Twombly-ish.
Sprout Gallery
Readers in UK and Europe might want to drop in to the above gallery in Moyser Road, Tooting, London SW16 6SE to see (maybe to buy) my paintings, or those of my partner, between Tuesday 5th and Sat 16th Feb, 11.00am – 5.00pm. For those in the Americas, Middle and Far East and Australasia, I realise the journey may be a little too much but you never know…
Blackpaint
1.02.13
Tags: Adam Mars-Jones, John Stezaker, Kurt Schwitters, Lincoln, MadMen, Max Ernst, Spielberg, Sprout Gallery, The Shield, Turner, Twombly
January 24, 2014 at 2:47 am |
Pink dockyards…..really like.
January 24, 2014 at 4:18 pm |
Thanks Roni