Georgia O’Keefe, Tate Modern
Autumn Tree – the Maple
I’ve been to the O’Keefe exhibition and wasn’t keen, on the whole. I think the trouble is with two things: firstly, the surfaces of her paintings – they’re too flat and dry, no texture. They would do equally well as prints, it seems to me (I remember, we felt the same about Hopper). Surface like Lempicka, even. That’s a matter of taste, I suppose, and so is the other problem, which is really the subject matter.
As with “American Sublime” a few years back and a Samuel Palmer in the watercolour exhibition, I think some things aren’t meant to be painted. Glorious sunsets, weird desert effects, they’re great in nature but mostly horrible on canvas. Like those garish postcards that olden days people used to send home from Thailand or wherever they’d been on holiday, they don’t convey the real thing. An exception is –
The Mountain, New Mexico
Same thing goes for antelope skulls – the real things are fantastic objects in themselves; why turn them into detailed, accurate drawings (except to provide an accurate scientific record)? Same thing should go for the flowers, but for some reason, I like those.
Anyway, I got “echoes” of a whole range of artists going round, some of them surprising:
Richard Hamilton – there were a couple of sheets of parchment-like paper, reminiscent of Hamilton’s early drawings of car fronts and fridges.
Luc Tuymans – grey/white sheets, tied or folded in the middle.
Marc/Macke – Lake George, Coat and Red (below)
Black Mesa Landscape (below) reminded me of Lawren Harris, who paints mountains like distant white blancmanges.
Generally, I thought of Nolan’s and other Australian’s renditions of landscape, Ayer’s Rock/Uluru for example.
Again generally, I got Mexican muralists for some reason. The picture I liked best was Winter Road (below) – hardly typical.
Youth, Sorrentino (2015) DVD
What is Sorrentino doing? He seems to be imitating the style of Terence Malick in the Tree of Life – but not doing it very well. The only memorable image is that of the enormously-bellied hotel guest on the tennis court, propelling the ball into the air time and again with a sort of nimble, fat athleticism. He’s supposed to be Maradona, apparently.
Fellini said that he’d chosen Donald Sutherland to play Casanova because the actor was wooden – Sorrentino perhaps chose Michael Caine for the same reason. Caine never seems to be acting in anything I’ve seen him in; he just says his lines, with an occasional slight gesture towards emotion – anger, or grief, say – as an indication of what his character might be feeling. He’s Michael Caine; why bother? He does look a lot like Sorrentino regular Tony Servillo in this, though. Harvey Keitel’s exit is hilarious. The music – Simple Songs, was it? – is terrible.
It got excellent reviews and won some prizes; must take another look to see what I missed.
So, nothing good this week (including the “change” of government). Stood all weekend in a Brixton street art fair with a bunch of my paintings and didn’t sell a single one. Then I turned out this pinkish affair, which I include only to have something new in the blog.
Work (not) in progress,
Blackpaint
14.7.16
Tags: August Macke, Donald Sutherland, Fellini, Franz Marc, Georgia O'Keefe, Lawren Harris, Luc Thuymans, Mexican Muralists, Michael Caine, Paolo Sorrentino, Richard Hamilton, Sidney Nolan
Leave a Reply