Richard Diebenkorn at the RA
Died and gone to heaven – well, very impressed anyway. I think he’s my number 4, after Joan Mitchell, de Kooning and Peter Lanyon. Some say he’s too easy; nice landscape-y images, pleasing, limpid palette… it’s a matter of taste, of course, but I went round and round, marvelling at one picture after another, and I’ll be going again, for sure. Anyway, these are my highlights:
Berkeley#57
The busiest canvas, I think; can’t stop turning to look at it wherever you are in the gallery. It all works better than in the photo above – colours are much richer.
Seated Woman (on board)
There’s something delectable about his drawings and paintings of women – they are sometimes rough, pentimenti showing, with a sort of intentional “clumsiness” as Jane Livingstone suggests in her book. he likes striped tops and skirts (and no clothes at all, too).
A Day at the Race
The split screen effect; you can see it too, in “Interior View of Buildings”, in which the strip of buildings itself acts as a sort of divider. It’s the Urbana series in which he uses this effect, I believe. Like window frames sometimes.
The Cigar Box Tops
Tiny, perfect versions of the huge ones.
Still lifes
I love the knife in a glass – that putty colour. And the Ashtray and Doors; looks to me like he’s painted over an old canvas, or board – the striations.
The figures
I’ve talked about the women – drinking coffee, reading the newspaper – there are a few men around, including one little one (picture, that is) that looks like Picasso – him, not one of his paintings. They remind me a lot of David Park, a Bay Area painter.
Ocean Park #79
The best, I think, of the Ocean Park series – like your in an ornate, slightly shabby indoor swimming pool, with the light pouring through a huge skylight. Takes me back to Deep End again (the Skolimowski film with Jane Asher that I’ve been watching in 30 minute chunks, because the script and acting are so clunky).
If I could, I would put in every picture in this exhibition.
Rubens and his Legacy (RA)
This got a blistering review in the Guardian from Jonathan Jones. I think; not enough big paintings, he said; too many sketches, too much padding, loads of pictures by artists who aren’t Rubens, and in which the “legacy” is spurious. There’s a lot in what he says, but it’s still a great exhibition, in the sense of containing loads of pictures that are fantastic to look at.
Tiger, Lion and Leopard Hunt
This is the poster boy of the exhibition and deservedly so – just look at it; it’s all happening, just as it would have happened in real life! One bloke is forcing open a lion’s jaws with his hands, while a tiger’s getting stuck into green man’s shoulder; and the other tiger has cubs in her mouth… Enough sarcasm, it’s a staggering composition and swirl of colours. I saw it at the top of the escalator at Tooting Bec tube station (poster, not the original) when I didn’t have my glasses on, and it looks fantastic as an abstract.
There are several other lion hunts by other greats, notably Rembrandt and a great lion hunt sketch by Rubens himself – they couldn’t have known those lion hunt reliefs from Nineveh, was it, or Nimrud…
Other Rubens highlights are:
James I uniting England and Scotland
This sketch, from Birmingham Art Gallery, I’ve included because of the guard’s incredibly muscular left leg, not really well reproduced here, but massively impressive in the flesh, so to speak… reminds me of the left leg of the grey horse in the previous picture. I like the angle of view in these ceiling sketches.
The Abdication of Persephone
Luminous little painting, fabulous but couldn’t find a repro…
Among the other painters represented, it’s worth mentioning the Kokoschka cartoon, in which Queen Victoria sits astride a shark, feeding it seamen (I quote the caption on the wall). Presumably its based on a Rubens painting. There’s a great Bocklin, “Battle on the Bridge”, shades of those Degas boys riding bareback in that famous picture. Also works by Picasso, Reynolds, Lawrence, Cezanne, Delacroix, Gericault – and in a related exhibition curated by Jenny Savile, three de Koonings, including a juicy one from 1977, in which the paint swipes are so thick that the paint has stretched and puckered into tiny holes as it dried. There’s also one of those red/orange/pink panel size women from 1971, and a collage from earlier. AND two colourful Auerbach portraits, brilliant obviously, and a fabulous Bacon nude, George Dyer, by the look of it. Savile herself has a big monochrome painting, a bit like a Kiefer, and Cicely Brown has a DK – ish picture that’s not up to her best. I’d pay to go and see this sub-exhibition alone.
The Fall of the Obese
There is a whole room full of Falls and in Rubens’ case, the sinners going to damnation all seem to be overweight. But then of course, so do most humans in Rubens’ works, particularly the women; I mention the wife of Captain Pugwash again, in this connection…
Anyway, too much to say for one blog, so continued next week, along with all three new exhibitions at Tate Britain.
These are the Counter Rhythms (WIP)
Blackpaint
22.03.15