Jackson Pollock, Blind Spots (Tate Liverpool)
This is a great little exhibition – about fifty pictures? – mostly from 1951 – 55, when his best stuff was supposed to have been done and decline set in. There are a few drip paintings from 1947-9, by way of context; staggering delicacy and intricacy in the twining of the coloured skeins, rendering laughable the comment in the Telegraph Review section that there is “more to Pollock than flinging paint violently onto canvas”, as if that is what he had ever done.
The large drip painting, although beautiful, does remind you (or me, anyway)of a Formica table top from the fifties. It’s the size, shape and the continuation of the pattern on the edges (because he did them on unprimed canvas on the floor and stretched them on supports afterwards).
Some favourites below:
No.8, 1952
This one strongly reminiscent of Asger Jorn – I’m thinking “Letter to my Son” (Tate Modern). It’s the little heads swimming about.
No.14, 1951
Is that a chameleon, stepping through the undergrowth? Probably not…
No.12, 1952
The big colourful one that Frank O’ Hara called a great “gigolo of a picture”.
As well as Jorn, you can see Picasso here and there. There are a couple of sets of prints, which I think conflict a little with Pollock’s spontaneous ethic; not just a driven genius then, a bit of business acumen there. A bit like De Kooning, deciding to “harvest” the newspaper sheets he placed on his paintings in the 60s, to keep the paint from drying too quickly; shift them a little to smear the image and you have a “Monoprint” that can be signed and sold, instead of chucked away.
Constellations, Tate Liverpool
The paintings in this collection are arranged in “constellations”, which ignore chronology and geography and bounce off each other in some not always apparent fashion. Fine, if you know plenty already but not helpful if you want a more art-historical approach. I realise this sounds like the eternally carping Jonathan Jones, but in this respect, he has a point. Some highlights below:
Henri Gaudier Brjeska
Dieter Roth – I think it goes this way round.
Pierre Bonnard
Michelangelo Pistoletto
What’s she feeling for there? Rather like my partner’s side of the bed.
Billy Fury
Superb statue, by Tom Murphy, of the great singer on the Albert Dock; the stance and the profile are perfect – I missed that lop-sided sneer/smile he used to do, though. “So near, yet so far away”..
Carver and Kidman
A very tenuous connection – rather like Constellations – here: I’d just been reading the Raymond Carver story about the boy who is run over on his birthday and slips into a coma, when Nicole appeared on TV in a film called “Rabbit Hole” – in which her son has been run over, chasing his dog across a road. The film is actually about his parents “coming to terms” and it employs that awful, universal, plink-plunk sequence of slow, single piano notes to signify melancholy – I think I’ve actually heard it in news bulletins, behind “special reports” by journalists “on the spot”. Thank goodness for the likes of Carver and Cheever and Wolff ; you couldn’t do one-note plinky behind films of their stories (I can think of three, “the Swimmer”, “Short Cuts” and “Jindabyne”).
Jodorowsky, Santa Sangre
Mexico, circus, clowns, knife-throwers, women wrestlers, ecstatic religion… arms chopped off, throats cut, murder by throwing knife and samurai sword, acid flung on genitals…the funeral of an elephant, the resurrection of a host of murdered “brides”…and it manages to be sentimental too, with an accompaniment of emotive Mexican song. Possibly some one-note plinky, even.
Work in “Progress”
Blackpaint
14.12.15